Allen v. Full Service Systems Corp.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Allen v. Full Service Systems Corp.

426 S.W.3d 684, 2014 WL 457943, 2014 Mo. App. LEXIS 101

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided February 4, 2014·No. No. ED 99740·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Claimant Janet Allen appeals the order of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission (“Commission”) disqualifying her from receiving unemployment benefits until she has earned wages for insured work equal to ten times her weekly benefit amount after August 14, 2012. We affirm the Commission’s order.

No error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Claimant Janet Allen appeals the order of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission (“Commission”) disqualifying her from receiving unemployment benefits until she has earned wages for insured work equal to ten times her weekly benefit amount after August 14, 2012. We affirm the Commission’s order.

No error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Allen v. Full Service Systems Corp., 426 S.W.3d 684, 2014 WL 457943, 2014 Mo. App. LEXIS 101 (Mo. Ct. App. 2014).

Pincite

426 S.W.3d 684 (Allen v. Full Service Systems Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.