Allen v. Foster

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Allen v. Foster

300 S.W.2d 789

Court of Appeals of Kentucky·Decided February 1, 1957·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is a motion for an appeal from a judgment of the Casey Circuit Court determining the boundary line between adjacent landowners Jane Allen and Ed Foster. The judgment recites that the land in question has a value of $1,000. There was ample evidence to sustain the finding that Jane Allen had no title to the land in [790] question either by instrument or by adverse possession.

The motion for an appeal is overruled and the judgment is affirmed.

MONTGOMERY, J., not sitting.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This is a motion for an appeal from a judgment of the Casey Circuit Court determining the boundary line between adjacent landowners Jane Allen and Ed Foster. The judgment recites that the land in question has a value of $1,000. There was ample evidence to sustain the finding that Jane Allen had no title to the land in [790] question either by instrument or by adverse possession.

The motion for an appeal is overruled and the judgment is affirmed.

MONTGOMERY, J., not sitting.

Allen v. Foster, 300 S.W.2d 789 (Ky. Ct. App. 1957).

Pincite

300 S.W.2d 789 (Allen v. Foster) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.