Allen v. Forshay

12 Wend. 217
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedSeptember 4, 1834
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 12 Wend. 217 (Allen v. Forshay) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Allen v. Forshay, 12 Wend. 217 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1834).

Opinion

By the Court,

Sutherland, J.

The question here is, whether, when the action is local and the venue is laid in a wrong county, the court will change the venue on the application of the defendant, or leave him to the remedy given by statute to nonsuit the plaintiff at the trial. 2 R. S. 353, § 14, and 409, § 3. When it clearly appears that the action is local, and the defendant moves to change the venue, his motion ought to be granted; but when there is a dispute whether the action be or be not local, the motion to change the venue ought to be determined upon the usual grounds governing in these cases, viz. the convenience of the parties and their witnesses. Here the action, beyond all doubt, is local, and the motion is accordingly granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Snaith
8 N.Y.S. 668 (New York Supreme Court, 1889)
State ex rel. McGuire v. Waterman
5 Nev. 323 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1869)
Brittan v. Peabody
4 Hill & Den. 61 (Court for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors, 1842)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
12 Wend. 217, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/allen-v-forshay-nysupct-1834.