Allen v. Fahy

30 Misc. 377, 63 N.Y.S. 1031
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedJanuary 15, 1900
StatusPublished

This text of 30 Misc. 377 (Allen v. Fahy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Allen v. Fahy, 30 Misc. 377, 63 N.Y.S. 1031 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1900).

Opinion

Nash, J.

The sureties upon the bond of a general guardian are 'not responsible for money which may come to the hands of the guardian from the sale of the real estate of his ward. Muir y. Wilson, Hopkins Oh. 512; cited and approved, Cook v. Lee, 6 Paige, 158. Therefore as to the sum of $970.32 stated in the decree of the Surrogate’s Court to have been received by the guardian in proceedings in Monroe County Court for the sale of the interest of the infant in real estate, and as to which it is stated in the decree that it is without prejudice to any defense the sureties of the guardian may have, the plaintiff is without remedy as against the defendants.

[378]*378The complaint must he wholly dismissed for the reason that it does not allege that an execution was issued upon the surrogate’s decree before the commencement of the action. Code Civil Procedure, § 2607. A demand only is alleged. The plaintiff having arrived at full age the action is in effect brought by him in his own behalf to recover against the sureties of the guardian upon his official bond, and clearly within the provisions of that section of the Code. Findings may be submitted.

Ordered accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cook v. Lee
6 Paige Ch. 158 (New York Court of Chancery, 1836)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
30 Misc. 377, 63 N.Y.S. 1031, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/allen-v-fahy-nysupct-1900.