Allen v. Clark

New York Court of Common Pleas

Allen v. Clark

28 N.Y.S. 1142, 8 Misc. 680, 59 N.Y. St. Rep. 283

New York Court of Common Pleas·Decided May 17, 1894·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

It is clear that we cannot review the evidence in order to determine whether there is a preponderance on the one side or the other. The general term of the city court has passed upon that, and its decision is final. The claim that the verdict is against the preponderance of evidence admits that there is some evidence to support the verdict. There is no other question raised in the joints of the appellant, and the judgment must be affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

It is clear that we cannot review the evidence in order to determine whether there is a preponderance on the one side or the other. The general term of the city court has passed upon that, and its decision is final. The claim that the verdict is against the preponderance of evidence admits that there is some evidence to support the verdict. There is no other question raised in the joints of the appellant, and the judgment must be affirmed, with costs.

Allen v. Clark, 28 N.Y.S. 1142, 8 Misc. 680, 59 N.Y. St. Rep. 283 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1894).

Pincite

28 N.Y.S. 1142 (Allen v. Clark) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.