Allen v. Champion
This text of 1 Wright 672 (Allen v. Champion) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The law knows no fractions of days, and notwithstanding the phraseology of the statute, it is necessary to give at least a day’s notice. The deposition must be rejected.
It having been proven that the plaintiff was a tenant of a house of the defendant, Champion, and that he had given permission to the other defendants to enter and occupy as his tenants, if they could do so peaceably, a witness was asked by the defendant if the plaintiff had paid his rent.
LANE, J. thought the evidence inadmissible.
WRIGHT and WOOD, J. thought the circumstances attending the entry, such as the non payment of rent, notice to quit, &o.r were admissible in mitigation of damages.
Verdict and judgment for plaintiff.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1 Wright 672, 1 Ohio Ch. 672, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/allen-v-champion-ohio-1834.