Allen v. Carsted Realty Corp.

223 A.D. 869
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 15, 1928·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The complaint alleges in terms that the action of the defendants was unreasonable and arbitrary. It moreover alleges a specific basis upon which the defendants predicated their conduct. We cannot say as a matter of law that this conduct was reasonable. Whether under all the circumstances of the case the defendants acted unreasonably and arbitrarily is a question of fact to be decided upon a trial. The order should, therefore, be affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, with leave to the defendants to answer within twenty [870] days from service of order upon payment of said costs. Present — Dowling, P. J., Merrell, Finch, McAvoy and Proskauer, JJ. Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, with leave to the defendants to answer within twenty days from service of order upon payment of said costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Allen v. Carsted Realty Corp., 223 A.D. 869 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1928).

223 A.D. 869 (Allen v. Carsted Realty Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Tulip Realty Co. of Florida v. Fuhrer
155 So. 2d 637 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1963)
Ogden v. Riverview Holding Corp.
134 Misc. 149 (New York Supreme Court, 1929)