Allen v. Care Focus

CourtNorth Carolina Industrial Commission
DecidedApril 9, 2007
DocketI.C. NOS. 162649 355745.
StatusPublished

This text of Allen v. Care Focus (Allen v. Care Focus) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering North Carolina Industrial Commission primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Allen v. Care Focus, (N.C. Super. Ct. 2007).

Opinion

* * * * * * * * * * *
The Full Commission reviewed the prior Opinion and Award based upon the record of the proceedings before Deputy Commissioner Stanback and the briefs and arguments before the Full Commission. The appealing parties have not shown good grounds to reconsider the evidence, receive further evidence, rehear the parties or their representatives, or amend the opinion of award, except for minor modifications. Accordingly the Full Commission affirms the Opinion and Award of Deputy Commissioner Stanback.

* * * * * * * * * * *
The Full Commission finds as a fact and concludes as matters of law the following, which were entered into by the parties in a Pre-Trial Agreement and at the hearing before the Deputy Commissioner as:

STIPULATIONS
1. All parties are properly before the Commission, and the Commission has jurisdiction of the parties and the subject matter.

2. Defendant-employers regularly employ three or more employees and are bound by the North Carolina Workers' Compensation Act. An employer-employee relationship existed between plaintiff and defendant-employers Care Focus and Health Management Associates, respectively, on June 18, 2001, and January 30, 2003, the dates of injury. *Page 3

3. The carriers on the risk at the time of the alleged injuries were Constitution State Services and Liberty Mutual.

4. Defendant-employer Health Management Associates and its carrier Liberty Mutual accepted plaintiff's left knee injury as compensable after the January 30, 2003, injury, and those defendants have been paying ongoing temporary total disability benefits and providing employee with medical treatment as to the left knee injury.

5. Plaintiff's average weekly wage for defendant-employer Health Management Associates was $954.00, which yields a compensation rate of $636.03 per week. Plaintiff's average weekly wage at defendant-employer Care Focus was $692.30, yielding a compensation rate of $461.53 per week.

6. Employee has not worked from May 8, 2003, to the present and continuing.

7. The parties stipulated into evidence Stipulated Exhibit #1, a notebook containing medical records, Industrial Commission forms, and discovery.

8. The depositions of Dr. Robert Wilson, Leslie Phillips, Ph.D., Dr. Todd Beedle, and Dr. Thomas Weber were received into evidence following the hearing before the Deputy Commissioner.

* * * * * * * * * * *
Based upon all the competent evidence of record and the reasonable inferences arising therefrom, the Full Commission makes the following:

FINDINGS OF FACT
1. Plaintiff was born January 12, 1949 and is a high school graduate. She received an Associates Degree in nursing from Vance-Granville Community College and is a registered nurse. *Page 4

2. Plaintiff began working for defendant-employer Care Focus as a nurse manager in November 1999. She worked there until June 2002 when she accepted a position as a home health nurse for defendant-employer Health Management Associates.

3. In October 1997, plaintiff injured her back and neck while lifting a patient at Maria Parham Hospital. She had surgery on her neck and received an impairment rating of 15% to her spine. She was injured again in January 1998 when a combative patient kicked her in the chest and chin at Maria Parham Hospital. She was injured yet again in November 1998 in her low back and right shoulder while restraining a combative patient at Maria Parham Hospital.

4. On June 18, 2001, while working at Care Focus in Durham, plaintiff stepped into an indented area in a newly repaved parking lot. Her immediate symptoms were to her left knee, groin and left lower back. The insurance carrier for Care Focus, Constitution State Services, accepted the claim as compensable. Most of the care plaintiff received for those injuries was at Triangle Orthopaedic Associates. The knee and groin injuries eventually healed.

5. In a discogram performed February 7, 2002, Dr. Robert Wilson, a physiatrist at Triangle Orthopedic Associates, found that plaintiff had two painful or symptomatic discs at L3-4 and at L4-5. Dr. Wilson also found annular tears at L3-4 and L4-5. Plaintiff's back pain continued to worsen until Dr. Wilson performed an IDET procedure on plaintiff at Granville Medical Center on March 13, 2002.

6. Following the IDET procedure, plaintiff experienced significant improvement in her back pain. However, she was instructed to not return to a job that would require her to sit or drive too much as that would damage the disc again. Therefore, plaintiff did not return to her job with Care Focus as it required a significant amount of driving. *Page 5

7. Plaintiff began employment with Health Management Services on June 10, 2002. Plaintiff informed Health Management Services of her prior workers' compensation injuries from which she was recovering. The job at Health Management Associates consisted of driving to the patients' homes, performing admission and discharge from home health services, changing dressings, teaching, administering IV medication, and other nursing duties.

8. On August 22, 2002, Dr. Wilson recommended a trial of chiropractic care as he felt that much of plaintiff's back problems were coming from stiffness and facet joint pain. Plaintiff was referred to Dr. Todd Beedle, a chiropractor in Louisburg.

9. Dr. Beedle first saw plaintiff on August 29, 2002. On that date, plaintiff was suffering with left knee, right groin, mid and low back pain from 76 to 100 percent of the day. Dr. Beedle diagnosed a facet syndrome, lumbosacral subluxation, muscle spasm, muscle stiffness, and subluxation complex. Dr. Beedle's chiropractic treatment was successful, and plaintiff would like to return to Dr. Beedle for more treatment.

10. On January 9, 2003, Dr. Wilson performed facet injections in plaintiff's low back. Following the facet injections, Dr. Wilson did not see plaintiff again until February 27, 2003.

11. On January 30, 2003, while working for Health Management Services in a patient's home, plaintiff missed a step in a poorly lit hallway. She injured both knees, the left more than the right, and aggravated her low back such that the pain was worse by the next day. Plaintiff reported the injury to her supervisor, Lydia Moose, and went to the emergency room at Franklin Regional Hospital. Although the medical records from that visit mention only knee pain, the Full Commission finds that, based upon the credible evidence of record, plaintiff also experienced back pain as a result of this accident of January 30, 2003. *Page 6

12. Plaintiff saw Dr. Beedle for an unscheduled appointment on January 31, 2003, and she reported to him that she had re-injured her back on the previous day. Dr. Beedle confirmed that her back was different on examination than it had been the prior visit. Plaintiff required more frequent visits with Dr. Beedle following her fall on January 30, 2003. Plaintiff's back pain was so severe on some days that Dr. Beedle could not perform adjustments but could only do soft tissue and physical therapy modalities.

13. It was Dr. Beedle's opinion, and the Full Commission finds as fact, that the compensable accident of January 30, 2003, materially aggravated plaintiff's back condition. The aggravation of plaintiff's low back pain caused by the January 30, 2003, fall lasted at least as long as Dr. Beedles's period of treatment, which ended May 2, 2003.

14.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 97-2
North Carolina § 97-2(6)
§ 97-25
North Carolina § 97-25
§ 97-29
North Carolina § 97-29

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Allen v. Care Focus, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/allen-v-care-focus-ncworkcompcom-2007.