Allen v. Brannon

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Allen v. Brannon

150 S.E.2d 51, 268 N.C. 164, 1966 N.C. LEXIS 1153

DecidedSeptember 21, 1966

StatusPublished

This text of 150 S.E.2d 51 (Allen v. Brannon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Allen v. Brannon, 150 S.E.2d 51, 268 N.C. 164, 1966 N.C. LEXIS 1153 (N.C. 1966).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

When considered in relation to the pleadings and the charge, the only reasonable interpretation of the verdict is that the jury found that the collision and all resulting damages were caused by the actionable negligence of defendant and by the actionable negligence of plaintiff. Hence, the verdict supports the judgment. See Nicholson v. Dean, 267 N.C. 375, 148 S.E. 2d 247, and cases cited.

There was no objection by plaintiff to the issues as submitted. Plaintiff, by exceptions to the charge, undertakes to challenge the sufficiency of the evidence to warrant submission of the second issue. However, careful examination of the evidence compels the conclusion that, when considered in the light most favorable to defendant, it was sufficient to require submission of the second issue and to support the jury’s verdict with reference thereto.

Each of plaintiff’s assignments of error has received careful consideration. In our view, none discloses prejudicial error. The verdict and judgment will not be disturbed.

No error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI