Allen v. Blanchard

9 Cow. 630

Opinion

Jones, Chancellor,

was in favor of affirming the judgment below, for reasons substantially the same "as assigned by that court.-

Jordan, Senator; desired to be excused' from giving any opinion, as. he was counsel in a cause involving precisely the same question as this. But the court" disallowed his excuse.-

*For affirmance, Allen, Dayan, Enos, Gardiner, Haight,- Jordan,- McCarty, Stebbins and Waterman, Senators.-

For reversal, Elsworth, Hart, Lake, McCall, McMartin, Smith, Spencer and Wilkeson, Senators.

Judgment affirmed.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Allen v. Blanchard, 9 Cow. 630 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1827).

9 Cow. 630 (Allen v. Blanchard) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.