Allen v. Blanchard
9 Cow. 630
Opinion
was in favor of affirming the judgment below, for reasons substantially the same "as assigned by that court.-
Jordan, Senator; desired to be excused' from giving any opinion, as. he was counsel in a cause involving precisely the same question as this. But the court" disallowed his excuse.-
*For affirmance, Allen, Dayan, Enos, Gardiner, Haight,- Jordan,- McCarty, Stebbins and Waterman, Senators.-
For reversal, Elsworth, Hart, Lake, McCall, McMartin, Smith, Spencer and Wilkeson, Senators.
Judgment affirmed.
Footnotes
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Allen v. Blanchard, 9 Cow. 630 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1827).
9 Cow. 630 (Allen v. Blanchard) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.