Allen v. Bilyeu

198 P. 208, 100 Or. 576, 1921 Ore. LEXIS 125
CourtOregon Supreme Court
DecidedMay 31, 1921
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 198 P. 208 (Allen v. Bilyeu) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Oregon Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Allen v. Bilyeu, 198 P. 208, 100 Or. 576, 1921 Ore. LEXIS 125 (Or. 1921).

Opinion

MoBRIDE, J.

1. So far as the overvaluation of its property is concerned, it would seem that the bank had lost any claim to recover on that score by reason of the fact that it had not applied to the board of equalization to correct such discriminatory assessment, if such was in fact made. But it clearly appears that the assessment upon shares of the capital stock was made against the bank, instead of against [578]*578the stockholders, and to this extent the assessment was void and the bank was not required to apply to the board of equalization to correct or set aside an absolutely void assessment. So, whatever may have been in the contemplation of the County Court at the time it made the order, the law will not interfere to compel the defendant bank to return the money refunded simply because the court gave a wrong reason for a proper decision: Graves County v. First Nat. Bank et al., 108 Ky. 194 (56 S. W. 16).

The decree is affirmed. Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Philippi v. Pacific Grains, Inc.
356 P.2d 438 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1960)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
198 P. 208, 100 Or. 576, 1921 Ore. LEXIS 125, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/allen-v-bilyeu-or-1921.