Allen v. Arguelles

1 F. Cas. 444, 4 Cranch 170, 4 D.C. 170

This text of 1 F. Cas. 444 (Allen v. Arguelles) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Allen v. Arguelles, 1 F. Cas. 444, 4 Cranch 170, 4 D.C. 170 (circtddc 1831).

Opinion

THE COURT,

(THRUSTON, [ Circuit Judge,]

doubting,)

was of opinion that the judgment of the justice at his chambers, a transcript of which was filed and entered in the records of the county court, was not a judgment of the county court, although the prothonotary of that court was authorized by statute to issue a fieri facias thereon to bind lands.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 F. Cas. 444, 4 Cranch 170, 4 D.C. 170, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/allen-v-arguelles-circtddc-1831.