Allen v. Allen

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Allen v. Allen

45 A. 375, 194 Pa. 419, 1900 Pa. LEXIS 405

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedJanuary 29, 1900

DocketAppeal, No. 176

StatusPublished

This text of 45 A. 375 (Allen v. Allen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Allen v. Allen, 45 A. 375, 194 Pa. 419, 1900 Pa. LEXIS 405 (Pa. 1900).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam,

The respondent admitted in her testimony that when she left her husband she intended to leave him forever. She went away to remote regions, Chicago and San Francisco, and was gone between two and three years, long enough to bring herself within the operation of the divorce law. We think the testimony shows that her desertion of her husband was wilful and malicious, and he was therefore entitled to a decree.

Decree affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam,

The respondent admitted in her testimony that when she left her husband she intended to leave him forever. She went away to remote regions, Chicago and San Francisco, and was gone between two and three years, long enough to bring herself within the operation of the divorce law. We think the testimony shows that her desertion of her husband was wilful and malicious, and he was therefore entitled to a decree.

Decree affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

45 A. 375, 194 Pa. 419, 1900 Pa. LEXIS 405, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/allen-v-allen-pa-1900.