Allen v. Allen

147 N.E. 310, 83 Ind. App. 20, 1925 Ind. App. LEXIS 1
CourtIndiana Court of Appeals
DecidedApril 23, 1925
DocketNo. 12,286.
StatusPublished

This text of 147 N.E. 310 (Allen v. Allen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Allen v. Allen, 147 N.E. 310, 83 Ind. App. 20, 1925 Ind. App. LEXIS 1 (Ind. Ct. App. 1925).

Opinion

Nichols, J.

Action by appellee to enjoin appellant from diverting water falling on his land from a natural watercourse, and casting upon the land of appellee. The only error assigned is the action of the court in overruling appellant’s demurrer to appellee’s reply to the second paragraph of answer. Appellant has failed to set out the reply and the demurrer thereto. Appellant must so prepare his brief that the questions sought to be presented therein can be determined without resort to the record. Pugh, Admr., v. Cleveland, etc., R. Co. (1915), 184 Ind. 350, 110 N. E. 193; Whipple v. Cain (1920), 73 Ind. App. 285, 127 N. E. 283.

Nothing is presented.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Pugh v. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co.
110 N.E. 193 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1915)
Whipple v. Cain
127 N.E. 283 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1920)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
147 N.E. 310, 83 Ind. App. 20, 1925 Ind. App. LEXIS 1, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/allen-v-allen-indctapp-1925.