Allen v. Allen

Supreme Court of Georgia

Allen v. Allen

175 S.E. 793, 179 Ga. 383, 1934 Ga. LEXIS 294

Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided September 14, 1934·No. No. 9960·Published

Opinion

Beck, P. J.

It would not be profitable to go into a discussion of the various issues raised by the pleadings in the case; but upon a consideration of the findings of the jury, which were authorized by evidence, the final decree was right and proper and equitable, in view of all the facts, and especially the fact that the claim of Wade H. Allen to the amount of compensation allowed him was not put in issue by any evidence. Excepting the plaintiffs, all of the heirs and administrators were satisfied, and agreed that the claim should be paid. Nor did the court err in overruling the demurrer to the answer and cross-action of Wade H. Allen.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices ■concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Beck, P. J.

It would not be profitable to go into a discussion of the various issues raised by the pleadings in the case; but upon a consideration of the findings of the jury, which were authorized by evidence, the final decree was right and proper and equitable, in view of all the facts, and especially the fact that the claim of Wade H. Allen to the amount of compensation allowed him was not put in issue by any evidence. Excepting the plaintiffs, all of the heirs and administrators were satisfied, and agreed that the claim should be paid. Nor did the court err in overruling the demurrer to the answer and cross-action of Wade H. Allen.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices ■concur.

Allen v. Allen, 175 S.E. 793, 179 Ga. 383, 1934 Ga. LEXIS 294 (Ga. 1934).

Pincite

175 S.E. 793 (Allen v. Allen) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.