Allen v. Allen

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Allen v. Allen

873 So. 2d 1259, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 7566, 2004 WL 1176268

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMay 28, 2004

DocketNo. 1D04-0794

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 873 So. 2d 1259 (Allen v. Allen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Allen v. Allen, 873 So. 2d 1259, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 7566, 2004 WL 1176268 (Fla. Ct. App. 2004).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We conclude that the facts alleged in petitioner’s third motion for disqualification, taken as true, were sufficient to establish a well-grounded fear on the part of petitioner that she would not receive a fair -and impartial hearing before the trial judge. Accordingly, the petition for writ of prohibition is granted, and on remand, a new judge shall be assigned to hear further proceedings in this matter. '

KAHN, WEBSTER and BROWNING, JJ., concur. '

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We conclude that the facts alleged in petitioner’s third motion for disqualification, taken as true, were sufficient to establish a well-grounded fear on the part of petitioner that she would not receive a fair -and impartial hearing before the trial judge. Accordingly, the petition for writ of prohibition is granted, and on remand, a new judge shall be assigned to hear further proceedings in this matter. '

KAHN, WEBSTER and BROWNING, JJ., concur. '

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

873 So. 2d 1259, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 7566, 2004 WL 1176268, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/allen-v-allen-fladistctapp-2004.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack