Allen, Stuart Wes
This text of Allen, Stuart Wes (Allen, Stuart Wes) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
WOMACK, J., not participating.
Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of burglary of a habitation and sentenced to twenty-five years' imprisonment. The Third Court of Appeals affirmed his conviction. Allen v. State, No. 03-85-00003-CR (Tex. App.-Austin Nov. 27, 1985, pet. ref'd).
Applicant contends that he was denied flat time, good and work time, and street time; that his mandatory supervision release date is incorrect; and that the procedures and rules under which he was reviewed for parole are improper. The trial court made findings of fact and conclusions of law and recommended that we deny relief. We conclude that Applicant's parole claims are moot. They are dismissed. His other claims are without merit and are denied. Accordingly, this application is dismissed in part and denied in part.
Filed: May 4, 2011
Do not publish
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Allen, Stuart Wes, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/allen-stuart-wes-texcrimapp-2011.