Allen-Straight v. State of Texas

N.D. Texas

Allen-Straight v. State of Texas

DecidedJuly 26, 2023

Docket3:23-cv-01087

StatusUnknown

This text of Allen-Straight v. State of Texas (Allen-Straight v. State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, N.D. Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Allen-Straight v. State of Texas, (N.D. Tex. 2023).

Pincite

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION BONNIE RUTH ALLEN-STRAIGHT, ) Petitioner, ) ) vs. ) No. 3:23-CV-1087-B-BH ) STATE OF TEXAS, ) Respondent. ) ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE After reviewing all relevant matters of record in this case, including the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge and any objections thereto, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), the undersigned District Judge is of the opinion that the Findings and Conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct and they are accepted as the Findings and Conclusions of the Court. For the reasons stated in the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge, the petitioner’s Writ of Coram Nobis, received on June 13, 2023 (doc. 10), is DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction.1 Also for the reasons stated in the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge, the filing is not construed as a § 2254 petition or a § 1983 action. If the petitioner files a notice of appeal, she must pay the $505.00 appellate filing fee or submit a motion to proceed in forma pauperis and a properly signed certificate of inmate trust account. 1 A certificate of appealability is not required to appeal the dismissal of a petition for writ of coram nobis. See, e.g., United States v. Few, 372 F. App’x 564, 564 (5th Cir. 2010). SIGNED this 26" day of July, 2023.

JANZJ. BOYLF UMTED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION BONNIE RUTH ALLEN-STRAIGHT, ) Petitioner, ) ) vs. ) No. 3:23-CV-1087-B-BH ) STATE OF TEXAS, ) Respondent. ) ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE After reviewing all relevant matters of record in this case, including the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge and any objections thereto, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), the undersigned District Judge is of the opinion that the Findings and Conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct and they are accepted as the Findings and Conclusions of the Court. For the reasons stated in the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge, the petitioner’s Writ of Coram Nobis, received on June 13, 2023 (doc. 10), is DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction.1 Also for the reasons stated in the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge, the filing is not construed as a § 2254 petition or a § 1983 action. If the petitioner files a notice of appeal, she must pay the $505.00 appellate filing fee or submit a motion to proceed in forma pauperis and a properly signed certificate of inmate trust account. 1 A certificate of appealability is not required to appeal the dismissal of a petition for writ of coram nobis. See, e.g., United States v. Few, 372 F. App’x 564, 564 (5th Cir. 2010). SIGNED this 26" day of July, 2023.

JANZJ. BOYLF UMTED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Allen-Straight v. State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/allen-straight-v-state-of-texas-txnd-2023.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack