Allen Smiley v. United States of America and James J. Boyle, United States Marshal for the Southern District of California

190 F.2d 560, 1951 U.S. App. LEXIS 2464
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedJuly 26, 1951
Docket12866
StatusPublished

This text of 190 F.2d 560 (Allen Smiley v. United States of America and James J. Boyle, United States Marshal for the Southern District of California) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Allen Smiley v. United States of America and James J. Boyle, United States Marshal for the Southern District of California, 190 F.2d 560, 1951 U.S. App. LEXIS 2464 (9th Cir. 1951).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We have for consideration consolidated appeals from an order denying motion to vacate and for relief pursuant to section 2255, T. 28 U.S.C.A., and an order denying petition for writ of habeas corpus and dismissing petition.

The same questions were tendered for the consideration of the District Court in each proceeding and said questions have been considered by this court in other proceedings before it. The orders of the District Court appealed from are affirmed on authority of Smiley v. United States, 9 Cir., 181 F.2d 505, and Smiley v. United States, 9 Cir., 186 F.2d 903.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Smiley v. United States
181 F.2d 505 (Ninth Circuit, 1950)
Smiley v. United States
186 F.2d 903 (Ninth Circuit, 1951)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
190 F.2d 560, 1951 U.S. App. LEXIS 2464, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/allen-smiley-v-united-states-of-america-and-james-j-boyle-united-states-ca9-1951.