Allen M. McCall Sr. v. Watkins Motor Lines, Inc.

Fourth Circuit

Allen M. McCall Sr. v. Watkins Motor Lines, Inc.

37 F.3d 1494, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 34853, 1994 WL 556955

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedOctober 12, 1994

Docket93-1548

StatusPublished

This text of 37 F.3d 1494 (Allen M. McCall Sr. v. Watkins Motor Lines, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Allen M. McCall Sr. v. Watkins Motor Lines, Inc., 37 F.3d 1494, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 34853, 1994 WL 556955 (4th Cir. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

37 F.3d 1494
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Allen M. McCALL, Sr., Plaintiff Appellant,
v.
WATKINS MOTOR LINES, INC., Defendant Appellee.

No. 93-1548.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Dec. 9, 1993.
Decided Oct. 12, 1994.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Graham C. Mullen, District Judge. (CA-91-349)

Allen M. McCall, Sr., appellant Pro Se.

John James Doyle, Jr., Constangy, Brooks & SMith, Winston-Salem, NC, for appellee.

W.D.N.C.

AFFIRMED.

Before WIDENER and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and SPROUSE, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order granting summary judgment for Appellee in Appellant's wrongful termination action. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. McCall v. Watkins Motor Lines, Inc., No. CA-91-349 (W.D.N.C. Apr. 7, 1993). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

37 F.3d 1494
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Allen M. McCALL, Sr., Plaintiff Appellant,
v.
WATKINS MOTOR LINES, INC., Defendant Appellee.

No. 93-1548.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Dec. 9, 1993.
Decided Oct. 12, 1994.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Graham C. Mullen, District Judge. (CA-91-349)

Allen M. McCall, Sr., appellant Pro Se.

John James Doyle, Jr., Constangy, Brooks & SMith, Winston-Salem, NC, for appellee.

W.D.N.C.

AFFIRMED.

Before WIDENER and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and SPROUSE, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order granting summary judgment for Appellee in Appellant's wrongful termination action. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. McCall v. Watkins Motor Lines, Inc., No. CA-91-349 (W.D.N.C. Apr. 7, 1993). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

37 F.3d 1494, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 34853, 1994 WL 556955, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/allen-m-mccall-sr-v-watkins-motor-lines-inc-ca4-1994.