Allen Hammler v. Godfry, et al.

E.D. California

Allen Hammler v. Godfry, et al.

DecidedOctober 29, 2025

Docket1:25-cv-00728

StatusUnknown

This text of Allen Hammler v. Godfry, et al. (Allen Hammler v. Godfry, et al.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. California primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Allen Hammler v. Godfry, et al., (E.D. Cal. 2025).

Pincite

Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ALLEN HAMMLER, No. 1:25-cv-00728-KES-BAM (PC) 12 Plaintiff, ORDER DISMISSING ACTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE FOR FAILURE TO PAY FILING 13 v. FEE 14 GODFRY, et al., Doc. 9 15 Defendants. 16 17 18 Plaintiff Allen Hammler is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights action 19 pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On August 18, 2025, the assigned magistrate judge issued findings 20 and recommendations recommending that plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis be 21 denied pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) and that plaintiff be required to pay the filing fee in full to 22 proceed with this action. Doc. 8. 23 On September 22, 2025, the Court adopted the findings and recommendations and ordered 24 plaintiff to pay the $405.00 filing fee in full within twenty-one (21) days. Doc. 9. Plaintiff was 25 warned that if he failed to pay the filing fee within the specified time, this action would be 26 dismissed without further notice. Id. at 2. Despite the Court’s warning, plaintiff has failed to pay 27 the required filing fee and the deadline for him to do so has expired. Without such payment, the 28 action cannot proceed before the Court. See Saddozai v. Davis, 35 F.4th 705, 709 (9th Cir. 2022). 1 Accordingly, 2 1. This action is dismissed without prejudice; and 3 2. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close this case. 4 5 6 | TPIS SO ORDERED. _ 7 Dated: _ October 28, 2025 4h UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ALLEN HAMMLER, No. 1:25-cv-00728-KES-BAM (PC) 12 Plaintiff, ORDER DISMISSING ACTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE FOR FAILURE TO PAY FILING 13 v. FEE 14 GODFRY, et al., Doc. 9 15 Defendants. 16 17 18 Plaintiff Allen Hammler is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights action 19 pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On August 18, 2025, the assigned magistrate judge issued findings 20 and recommendations recommending that plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis be 21 denied pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) and that plaintiff be required to pay the filing fee in full to 22 proceed with this action. Doc. 8. 23 On September 22, 2025, the Court adopted the findings and recommendations and ordered 24 plaintiff to pay the $405.00 filing fee in full within twenty-one (21) days. Doc. 9. Plaintiff was 25 warned that if he failed to pay the filing fee within the specified time, this action would be 26 dismissed without further notice. Id. at 2. Despite the Court’s warning, plaintiff has failed to pay 27 the required filing fee and the deadline for him to do so has expired. Without such payment, the 28 action cannot proceed before the Court. See Saddozai v. Davis, 35 F.4th 705, 709 (9th Cir. 2022). 1 Accordingly, 2 1. This action is dismissed without prejudice; and 3 2. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close this case. 4 5 6 | TPIS SO ORDERED. _ 7 Dated: _ October 28, 2025 4h UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Allen Hammler v. Godfry, et al., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/allen-hammler-v-godfry-et-al-caed-2025.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack