Allen (Gene) Vs. State
This text of 476 P.3d 870 (Allen (Gene) Vs. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nevada Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
GENE ANTHONY ALLEN, No. 82015 Petitioner, vs. FILED THE STATE OF NEVADA, Respondent. DEC 0 3 2020 ELIZABETH A. BROWN CLERK OF SUPREME COURT ORDER DENYING PETITION BY 5.V DEptrry RK 6"arEtt
This original pro se petition for a writ of habeas corpus appears to seek an order compelling a determination that petitioner is eligible for parole. Such a writ should be sought in the district court in the first instance, and an adverse ruling below may be challenged by way of an appeal. See NRAP 22 ("An application for an original writ of habeas corpus should be made to the appropriate district court. If an application is made to the district court and denied, the proper remedy is by appeal from the district court's order denying the writ."). Accordingly, we ORDER the petition DENIED.
Pideldf , C.J.
Pickering
/ J.
Hardesty Silver
cc: Gene Anthony Allen Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk
SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA
(0) ) 947A afglipt.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
476 P.3d 870, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/allen-gene-vs-state-nev-2020.