Allen "F" Calton v. Steve Schiller

Opinion

The Court of Appeals RECEIVED The IN uuurt of Aopeals Sixth blXTn Distrir* u,StriCt r"l Sixth District

^~" ol,i5« OGT16 2015 Tswkana. Taxas AwtoV Ueira Auirev, Clerk N* Afc,. tS*- \ S" -QDC*o3l- CODebra !exa'te"a/Te*™ K, Autrey, Clerk

jo^i Co^a A^U\ Ail^f OlfJoo Cc^W ^

p*^ t-t**. -r**** Ov^ ©uW* d-ic ^-Tariaa^^y

Cft -r«fT«^ ^o^\ Bfttlik ac^ ^WrV* <5*> uU^^ ."VWfei-U^ L

f>C<>

VACo^JLy ^ovo^^--e^\^a4: \\r»U5^L A^ /Woaw2> (Si J^A

„«* x-epruaJ-e^W •*» -.-V^'^-r , ~,^^~A^^^^*'*>»*•*«AWL Oi ^€iCnlo^ ^^^\ &\4r<^kS pou^w^ knx^firf kyCAi fr^Vij) C^tiiL r\t&Lr ^^-M-e. CouM; Uv i-Jut^ -^ Jtu*VuXl£

^O^S AuoMiie^ c\l -Wo&looS or rv^lrc/»uA wAe/^ -T-*cJKon fXC&/ cs>r -S-t<&6n W.tfOS or tr*toM>V$-(l/' S-ea-oaWk AtC&*oiA C^a&Wa^ pr^'ovn £Vo^j fi|-e^

c^?v^^ W i^cJfibq K^ (£y cjUo-h 4-o^Ufcti -tk,

^u^fe. Acco^\ ^^Ufau^V c^?a£*vJo£ <^Wcod^c-Q-J| 0>6Q -

A^Vl^s Wi WnV*.^^ ^Jcrc^t^^^ \n ^ ^Uc-y ^<^ -A* -conked ^ mtekWllS

aikcu^ oQ-^ record 6U<^h fta ^ ^ 9-?oHrT ,JU*fW fe^m Co^Voj^ &r'e* oricr c*^eJUoj tf* flvjVad-^c (UWtc^^n vV\ «^reL Q^WOA C-T^^ Corf d%)-}U (VjC

pyx q-so'l^, A^eAlc^\ ~-o«~w

pi/Dww JUx^JttJL-^r^oi^x -fc^i ar^W oAwf^ G^^*2- ~V

&4">&VcA A/V^Vu^^U '0./\X^L f^^M O^-^Wi O^VlOO „gfc/>uf# Af-

41^ rv^V>b/\ UJwlA b^L oppose ^ «,

Af^c^i r^U fjr \>^.6ou^V^(AxTCi^t^ fn^r£fe