Allen F. Calton v. G. Ekeke

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedMay 12, 2016
Docket09-16-00092-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Allen F. Calton v. G. Ekeke (Allen F. Calton v. G. Ekeke) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Allen F. Calton v. G. Ekeke, (Tex. Ct. App. 2016).

Opinion

In The

Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont ____________________ NO. 09-16-00092-CV ____________________

ALLEN F. CALTON, Appellant

V.

G. EKEKE, Appellee _______________________________________________________ ______________

On Appeal from the 58th District Court Jefferson County, Texas Trial Cause No. A-198,064 ________________________________________________________ _____________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant Allen F. Calton filed a notice of appeal of the trial court’s denial

of his “Motion for Preliminary Injunction.” The clerk’s record demonstrates that

the initial relief requested was a temporary restraining order pending subsequent

hearings on a temporary injunction and permanent mandatory injunctive relief, and

the trial court treated the motion as an application for a temporary restraining

order. On April 6, 2016, we notified Calton that his appeal was subject to dismissal

because the notice of appeal neither stated that a final order had been signed nor

1 identified an interlocutory order for which an appeal was available. In his response,

Calton concedes he is appealing the denial of a temporary restraining order, but he

argues the appeal may proceed as an appeal from the denial of a temporary

injunction.

A temporary restraining order directs the conduct of a party pending

imminent disposition of a request for a temporary injunction. See In re Tex. Nat.

Res. Conservation Comm’n, 85 S.W.3d 201, 205 (Tex. 2002). An interlocutory

order on an application for a temporary restraining order is generally not an

appealable order. Rakowitz v. Bexar Cty. Sheriffs Dep’t, No. 04-13-00093-CV,

2013 WL 2446725, at *1 (Tex. App—San Antonio June 5, 2013, no pet.) (mem.

op.). Calton’s response does not show grounds for continuing the appeal. This

appeal is, therefore, dismissed for want of jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(a).

APPEAL DISMISSED.

________________________________ CHARLES KREGER Justice

Submitted on May 11, 2016 Opinion Delivered May 12, 2016

Before McKeithen, C.J., Kreger and Johnson, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In Re Texas Natural Resource Conservation Commission
85 S.W.3d 201 (Texas Supreme Court, 2002)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Allen F. Calton v. G. Ekeke, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/allen-f-calton-v-g-ekeke-texapp-2016.