Allen ex rel. Marcelline O. v. Lawrence P.

208 A.D.2d 721, 617 N.Y.S.2d 528
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedOctober 17, 1994
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 208 A.D.2d 721 (Allen ex rel. Marcelline O. v. Lawrence P.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Allen ex rel. Marcelline O. v. Lawrence P., 208 A.D.2d 721, 617 N.Y.S.2d 528 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

Opinion

In a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 5 to establish paternity and for an order of support, the father appeals from an order of the Family Court, Westchester County (Braslow, J.), entered May 8, 1993, which denied his objections to an order of the same court (Edlitz, H.E.), dated January 25, 1993, directing him to pay, inter alia, child support of $155 per week.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

In a paternity proceeding, the findings of the hearing court are entitled to great weight and, generally, should not be disturbed on appeal unless they are found to be contrary to the weight of the evidence (see, Matter of Everlyn T. v Willis Charles T., 155 AD2d 546). Here, the results of the human leucocyte antigen test and other blood marker tests indicate a 99.72% probability of the appellant’s paternity. Although not conclusive with regard to the issue of paternity, these results are highly probative (see, Matter of Nancy M. G. v James M., 148 AD2d 714) and, coupled with the petitioner’s testimony, which was found to be credible by the hearing court and which contains the essential elements of proof necessary to sustain the petition, establish the appellant’s paternity by clear and convincing evidence (see, Matter of Commissioner of Social Servs. v Philip De G., 59 NY2d 137, 141-142; Matter of Department of Social Servs. v Richard A., 121 AD2d 382).

We have examined the appellant’s remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. Sullivan, J. P., Balletta, Rosenblatt and Florio, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Anne R. v. Estate of Francis C.
234 A.D.2d 375 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1996)
Debra J. v. Troy G.
228 A.D.2d 600 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1996)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
208 A.D.2d 721, 617 N.Y.S.2d 528, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/allen-ex-rel-marcelline-o-v-lawrence-p-nyappdiv-1994.