Allen Engineering Co. v. Kays

152 S.W. 992, 106 Ark. 174, 1913 Ark. LEXIS 197
Supreme Court of Arkansas·Decided January 13, 1913·Published·Cited by 17 cases

Opinions

Kirby, J.,

(after stating the facts). Appellant brings this suit in replevin for the machinery and appliances installed in the State Agricultural School for the First District at Jonesboro, under the terms of a contract of sale thereof made by it with the directors of said school, in which it reserved the title to the property until it was paid for and the right to take possession thereof upon the failure to pay the remainder of the purchase price.

Appellees have no interest, whatever, in the property, in their individual capacity, nor connection with it, except as representatives of the State as trustees of said school. The school, itself, is but a governmental agency, not authorized by the statutes to sue and be sued and the recovery is sought under the terms of the contract .made with this governmental agency necessarily involving its rights and being in effect and in fact but a suit against the State. No relief is sought against appellees in their individual capacity and none can be had against them as representatives of the agency of the State and its sovereignty, for our Constitution declares: “The State of Arkansas shall never be made defendant in any of her courts.” Art. 5, § 19; Pitcock v. State, 91 Ark. 527; Jobe v. Urquhart, 98 Ark. 525.

The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Allen Engineering Co. v. Kays, 152 S.W. 992, 106 Ark. 174, 1913 Ark. LEXIS 197 (Ark. 1913).

152 S.W. 992 (Allen Engineering Co. v. Kays) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Biden v. Nebraska
600 U.S. 477 (Supreme Court, 2023)
Opinion No.
Arkansas Attorney General Reports, 1987
Cammack v. Chalmers
680 S.W.2d 689 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1984)
State Comm'r of Labor v. University of Arkansas Board of Trustees
407 S.W.2d 916 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1966)
Muse v. Prescott School Dist.
349 S.W.2d 329 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1961)
Fairbanks v. Sheffield
292 S.W.2d 82 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1956)
Arkansas v. Texas
346 U.S. 368 (Supreme Court, 1953)
McCain, Comm. of Labor v. Crossett Lumber Company
174 S.W.2d 114 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1943)
Watson v. Dodge
63 S.W.2d 993 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1933)
State Ex Rel. Attorney General v. Lovett-Carnahan Co.
14 S.W.2d 233 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1929)