Allen-Eaton Panel Co. v. Commissioner

3 B.T.A. 56, 1925 BTA LEXIS 2052
CourtUnited States Board of Tax Appeals
DecidedNovember 16, 1925
DocketDocket No. 1639.
StatusPublished

This text of 3 B.T.A. 56 (Allen-Eaton Panel Co. v. Commissioner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Board of Tax Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Allen-Eaton Panel Co. v. Commissioner, 3 B.T.A. 56, 1925 BTA LEXIS 2052 (bta 1925).

Opinion

[57]*57opinion.

GeaupneR

: To establish the value of the taxpayer’s tangible property as of the date of acquisition, counsel relied on depositions of certain stockholders of the taxpayer company, an appraisal report, and the deposition of an officer of the appraisal company. The depositions of the stockholders merely relate the circumstances surrounding the organization of the taxpayer corporation and, in one instance, the approximate rental value of near-by land. No attempt was made to show the area of land, the number, size, condition of the buildings acquired, or their market value.

The officer of the appraisal company in his deposition explained that in preparing appraisal reports the notes of field engineers are sent to the home office with pricing* information taken from local sources and the notes are priced in the home office. The officer frankly admitted that he had never made an examination of the taxpayer’s property and that the report was not even made under his direction. Such evidence is insufficient. Appeal of Stokes Milling Co., 2 B. T. A. 1284.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Appeal of Allen-Eaton Panel Co.
3 B.T.A. 56 (Board of Tax Appeals, 1925)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
3 B.T.A. 56, 1925 BTA LEXIS 2052, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/allen-eaton-panel-co-v-commissioner-bta-1925.