Allen County Mutual Insurance v. Vorys

Ohio Court of Appeals

Allen County Mutual Insurance v. Vorys

192 N.E.2d 110, 117 Ohio App. 279, 24 Ohio Op. 2d 68, 1962 Ohio App. LEXIS 607

CourtOhio Court of Appeals

DecidedJune 26, 1962

Docket7035

StatusPublished

This text of 192 N.E.2d 110 (Allen County Mutual Insurance v. Vorys) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Allen County Mutual Insurance v. Vorys, 192 N.E.2d 110, 117 Ohio App. 279, 24 Ohio Op. 2d 68, 1962 Ohio App. LEXIS 607 (Ohio Ct. App. 1962).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This action was originally filed in the Common Pleas Court of Franklin County, and the plain tiff s-appellees sought a declaratory judgment and an injunction to prevent the Superintendent of Insurance from taking action to keep the plaintiffs from insuring certain dwellings. The court did render a declaratory judgment and granted the injunction as requested.

The Superintendent of Insurance filed an appeal on questions of law and fact, and the appellees have filed a motion seeking an order dismissing the appeal on questions of law and fact and retaining it on questions of law only. In support of their motion the appellees have cited two decisions previously rendered by this court. Security Benefit Life Ins. Co. v. Robinson, Supt. (1958), 79 Ohio Law Abs., 97, and the unreported case of Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States v. Robinson, Supt. (1959), No. 6086.

We conclude that the injunctive relief sought was incidental to the main question of law which the Court of Common Pleas decided and, therefore, the motion to dismiss the appeal on questions of law and fact should be sustained.

The motion is hereby sustained, and the appeal retained on questions of law only. The defendant-appellant is given 30 days in which to file a proper bill of exceptions, and the parties shall file their assignments of error and briefs within the time prescribed by the rules of this court.

Judgment accordingly.

Duffey, P. J. Duffy and Bryant, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

This action was originally filed in the Common Pleas Court of Franklin County, and the plain tiff s-appellees sought a declaratory judgment and an injunction to prevent the Superintendent of Insurance from taking action to keep the plaintiffs from insuring certain dwellings. The court did render a declaratory judgment and granted the injunction as requested.

The Superintendent of Insurance filed an appeal on questions of law and fact, and the appellees have filed a motion seeking an order dismissing the appeal on questions of law and fact and retaining it on questions of law only. In support of their motion the appellees have cited two decisions previously rendered by this court. Security Benefit Life Ins. Co. v. Robinson, Supt. (1958), 79 Ohio Law Abs., 97, and the unreported case of Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States v. Robinson, Supt. (1959), No. 6086.

We conclude that the injunctive relief sought was incidental to the main question of law which the Court of Common Pleas decided and, therefore, the motion to dismiss the appeal on questions of law and fact should be sustained.

The motion is hereby sustained, and the appeal retained on questions of law only. The defendant-appellant is given 30 days in which to file a proper bill of exceptions, and the parties shall file their assignments of error and briefs within the time prescribed by the rules of this court.

Judgment accordingly.

Duffey, P. J. Duffy and Bryant, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

192 N.E.2d 110, 117 Ohio App. 279, 24 Ohio Op. 2d 68, 1962 Ohio App. LEXIS 607, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/allen-county-mutual-insurance-v-vorys-ohioctapp-1962.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack