Allen County Bar Ass'n v. Sabol

683 N.E.2d 1069, 79 Ohio St. 3d 387
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided September 24, 1997·No. No. 97-807·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

As a result of an automobile accident on October 4, 1989, Kathy and Bri Thompson engaged respondent to represent them in pursuing their personal injury claims. On June 6, 1990, Kathy Thompson filed a bankruptcy petition and consequently her interest in her personal injury claim was limited to her claimed exemption. Despite the limitation on Kathy Thompson’s recovery and despite the fact that the Thompsons failed to advance the requested costs and expenses, once having filed the case, respondent should not have taken unilateral action to dismiss it. Instead, respondent should have asked the trial court for permission to withdraw as counsel. We therefore adopt the findings, conclusions, and recommendations of the board, and respondent is hereby publicly reprimanded.

Costs are taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Allen County Bar Ass'n v. Sabol, 683 N.E.2d 1069, 79 Ohio St. 3d 387 (Ohio 1997).

683 N.E.2d 1069 (Allen County Bar Ass'n v. Sabol) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Disciplinary Counsel v. Sabol
886 N.E.2d 191 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2008)
Allen Cty. Bar Assn. v. Sabol
1997 Ohio 141 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1997)