Allen C. Weissman Co. v. Denison

Third Circuit

Allen C. Weissman Co. v. Denison

77 F.2d 1022, 1935 U.S. App. LEXIS 4865

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit

DecidedMay 10, 1935

DocketNos. 5562, 5563

StatusPublished

This text of 77 F.2d 1022 (Allen C. Weissman Co. v. Denison) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Allen C. Weissman Co. v. Denison, 77 F.2d 1022, 1935 U.S. App. LEXIS 4865 (3d Cir. 1935).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In the equity receivership below, two orders were made by the judge, one confirming a sale of the assets of the company involved, the other dismissing a petition for reorganization of said company under section 77B, Bankr. Act, 11 USCA § 207. From each of these orders appeals were taken. Such appeals concern the individual facts growing out of this receivership, and we deem a discussion thereof unnecessary.

On final analysis, the question of the confirmation of this sale centers on whether the administrative judge abused his discretion in confirming the same. We have carefully considered all phases of the situation, including that of alleged fraud by the parties, with the result that we are of opinion the judge was right. We therefore affirm the decree of confirmation, and, as this virtually eliminates the question of reorganization, both appeals are dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

In the equity receivership below, two orders were made by the judge, one confirming a sale of the assets of the company involved, the other dismissing a petition for reorganization of said company under section 77B, Bankr. Act, 11 USCA § 207. From each of these orders appeals were taken. Such appeals concern the individual facts growing out of this receivership, and we deem a discussion thereof unnecessary.

On final analysis, the question of the confirmation of this sale centers on whether the administrative judge abused his discretion in confirming the same. We have carefully considered all phases of the situation, including that of alleged fraud by the parties, with the result that we are of opinion the judge was right. We therefore affirm the decree of confirmation, and, as this virtually eliminates the question of reorganization, both appeals are dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

77 F.2d 1022, 1935 U.S. App. LEXIS 4865, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/allen-c-weissman-co-v-denison-ca3-1935.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack