Allen-Bradley Co.
137 Ct. Cl. 925
This text of 137 Ct. Cl. 925 (Allen-Bradley Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Court of Claims primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Allen-Bradley Co., 137 Ct. Cl. 925 (cc 1957).
Opinion
Excess profits tax. Plaintiff entitled to recover. Opinion 134 C. Cls. 800.
In this case, on the mandate of the Supreme Court (352 U. S. 306), the following order was entered:
ORDER
This case comes before the court on remand from the Supreme Court, that Court having, by an opinion on January 22,1957, reversed the decision of April 3,1956, by this court.
It is ordered this sixth day of March, 1957, that, pursuant to the remand filed in this court on February 20, 1957, the judgment entered in this court on April 3,1956, to the effect that plaintiff was entitled to recover, be and the samé is vacated and withdrawn and plaintiff’s petition is dismissed.
By the Court.
Marvin Jones,
Chief Judge.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
United States v. Allen-Bradley Co.
352 U.S. 306 (Supreme Court, 1957)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
137 Ct. Cl. 925, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/allen-bradley-co-cc-1957.