Allegheny Teledyne Inc. v. United States

20 F. App'x 849, 51 Fed. Cl. 849
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
DecidedSeptember 28, 2001
DocketNo. 680, 681, 682, 683
StatusPublished

This text of 20 F. App'x 849 (Allegheny Teledyne Inc. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Allegheny Teledyne Inc. v. United States, 20 F. App'x 849, 51 Fed. Cl. 849 (Fed. Cir. 2001).

Opinion

LOURIE, Circuit Judge.

ORDER

Allegheny Teledyne Incorporated, et al., General Motors Corporation, and the United States petition for permission to appeal the orders certified for immediate appeal by the Court of Federal Claims in these cases.

These cases involve the interpretation and application of Cost Accounting Standard 413.50(c)(12), regarding the parties’ rights to assets in pension plans when a segment closing occurs. This court must exercise its own discretion whether it will grant permission to appeal an interlocutory order certified by a trial court. See In re Convertible Rowing Exerciser Patent Litigation, 903 F.2d 822 (Fed.Cir.1990). We determine that granting the petitions is appropriate.

Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

The petitions for permission to appeal ’are granted. The cases are consolidated.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In Re Convertible Rowing Exerciser Patent Litigation
903 F.2d 822 (Federal Circuit, 1990)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
20 F. App'x 849, 51 Fed. Cl. 849, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/allegheny-teledyne-inc-v-united-states-cafc-2001.