Allegheny Forging Co. v. Commissioner

166 F.2d 1020, 36 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 894, 1948 U.S. App. LEXIS 3997
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit
DecidedApril 5, 1948
DocketNo. 9520
StatusPublished

This text of 166 F.2d 1020 (Allegheny Forging Co. v. Commissioner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Allegheny Forging Co. v. Commissioner, 166 F.2d 1020, 36 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 894, 1948 U.S. App. LEXIS 3997 (3d Cir. 1948).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

■ An examination of the briefs.and the appendices thereto and consideration of the oral argument in the appeal at bar demonstrate that the findings of the Tax Court are adequately supported by the record and that that tribunal committed no clear cut mistake of law. Dobson v. Commissioner, 320 U.S. 489, 64 S.Ct. 239, 88 L.Ed. 248. Accordingly the decision will be affirmed .

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Dobson v. Commissioner
320 U.S. 489 (Supreme Court, 1944)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
166 F.2d 1020, 36 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 894, 1948 U.S. App. LEXIS 3997, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/allegheny-forging-co-v-commissioner-ca3-1948.