Home/Court of Appeals of Oregon/Alleged to Have Mental Illness. State v. I. T.-H. (In re I. T.-H.)

Alleged to Have Mental Illness. State v. I. T.-H. (In re I. T.-H.)

444 P.3d 1148, 298 Or. App. 552
CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon
DecidedJuly 24, 2019
DocketA169758
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 444 P.3d 1148 (Alleged to Have Mental Illness. State v. I. T.-H. (In re I. T.-H.)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Alleged to Have Mental Illness. State v. I. T.-H. (In re I. T.-H.), 444 P.3d 1148, 298 Or. App. 552 (Or. Ct. App. 2019).

Opinion

PER CURIAM

*553Appellant seeks reversal of a judgment committing him to the Mental Health Division for a *554period not to exceed 180 days. ORS 426.130. Appellant contends that the trial court erred because the record does not contain clear and convincing evidence that appellant is a "person with mental illness." ORS 426.005(1)(f). The state concedes that the evidence is legally insufficient to support appellant's commitment and that the judgment should be reversed. We agree, accept the state's concession, and reverse the judgment of commitment.

Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Soto-Navarro
482 P.3d 150 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2021)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
444 P.3d 1148, 298 Or. App. 552, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/alleged-to-have-mental-illness-state-v-i-t-h-in-re-i-t-h-orctapp-2019.