Alldred v. United States
This text of Alldred v. United States (Alldred v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION DEREK MYLAN ALLDRED, #27177-078 § § VS. § CIVIL ACTION NO. 4:20cv620 § CRIMINAL ACTION NO. 4:17cr105 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA § MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Pro se Movant Derek Mylan Alldred filed a motion for leave to appeal in forma pauperis (#26). An appellant may proceed in forma pauperis on appeal only if he is economically eligible and presents a nonfrivolous issue. See Carson v. Polley, 689 F.2d 562, 586 (5th Cir. 1982). A review of the case shows that, on September 29, 2023, the Court denied Movant’s Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Sentence because the issues he raised were without merit. At that time, the Court denied a certificate of appealability (#22). Because Movant has neither presented a nonfrivolous issue nor shown that he is entitled to a certificate of appealability, he also has not shown that he is entitled to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal. United States v. Delario, 120 F.3d 580, 582 (5th Cir. 1997). It is therefore ORDERED Movant’s motion for leave to appeal in forma pauperis (#26) is DENIED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Alldred v. United States, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/alldred-v-united-states-txed-2024.