Allano v. Oliva

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Allano v. Oliva

52 A.D.3d 507, 857 N.Y.S.2d 914

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 3, 2008

StatusPublished

This text of 52 A.D.3d 507 (Allano v. Oliva) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Allano v. Oliva, 52 A.D.3d 507, 857 N.Y.S.2d 914 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2008).

Pincite

Opinion

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, inter alia, to review a determination of the respondent Zoning Board of Appeals of the Town of Southold dated September 1, 2006, which, after a hearing, denied the petitioner’s application for an area variance, the petitioner appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Whelan, J.), dated June 10, 2007, as granted those branches of the respondents’ motion which were to dismiss stated portions of the petition on the ground that they were time-barred and for failure to exhaust administrative remedies.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

The order appealed from is not appealable as of right (see CPLR 5701 [b]; Matter of Coppola v Good Samaritan Hosp. Med. Ctr., 296 AD2d 460 [2002]), and we decline to grant leave to appeal (see CPLR 5701 [c]). Lifson, J.P, Miller, Dillon and Eng, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, inter alia, to review a determination of the respondent Zoning Board of Appeals of the Town of Southold dated September 1, 2006, which, after a hearing, denied the petitioner’s application for an area variance, the petitioner appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Whelan, J.), dated June 10, 2007, as granted those branches of the respondents’ motion which were to dismiss stated portions of the petition on the ground that they were time-barred and for failure to exhaust administrative remedies.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

The order appealed from is not appealable as of right (see CPLR 5701 [b]; Matter of Coppola v Good Samaritan Hosp. Med. Ctr., 296 AD2d 460 [2002]), and we decline to grant leave to appeal (see CPLR 5701 [c]). Lifson, J.P, Miller, Dillon and Eng, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

52 A.D.3d 507, 857 N.Y.S.2d 914, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/allano-v-oliva-nyappdiv-2008.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack