Allan v. McChesney

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Allan v. McChesney

194 A.D.2d 785, 599 N.Y.S.2d 1013

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 28, 1993

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 194 A.D.2d 785 (Allan v. McChesney) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Allan v. McChesney, 194 A.D.2d 785, 599 N.Y.S.2d 1013 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

—In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of respondent Zoning Board of Appeals of the Village of Bellport, dated November 28, 1989, in which the petitioners also requested ancillary declaratory relief, the intervenors Kenneth A. Rosenblum and Gloria M. Rosenblum appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Gerard, J.), entered April 17, 1991, which dismissed the proceeding.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs to the respondents-respondents.

In successfully opposing the petition and obtaining its dismissal by the trial court, the intervenors-appellants were granted all of the relief to which they are entitled in this proceeding. The independent challenges to the propriety of the determination raised by the intervenors-appellants were barred by the applicable 30-day Statute of Limitations contained in Village Law former § 7-712 (3). Thompson, J. P., Miller, Eiber and Santucci, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of respondent Zoning Board of Appeals of the Village of Bellport, dated November 28, 1989, in which the petitioners also requested ancillary declaratory relief, the intervenors Kenneth A. Rosenblum and Gloria M. Rosenblum appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Gerard, J.), entered April 17, 1991, which dismissed the proceeding.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs to the respondents-respondents.

In successfully opposing the petition and obtaining its dismissal by the trial court, the intervenors-appellants were granted all of the relief to which they are entitled in this proceeding. The independent challenges to the propriety of the determination raised by the intervenors-appellants were barred by the applicable 30-day Statute of Limitations contained in Village Law former § 7-712 (3). Thompson, J. P., Miller, Eiber and Santucci, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

194 A.D.2d 785, 599 N.Y.S.2d 1013, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/allan-v-mcchesney-nyappdiv-1993.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack