Allan v. Allan

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Allan v. Allan

96 N.E.2d 234, 326 Mass. 796

CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

DecidedJanuary 2, 1951

StatusPublished

This text of 96 N.E.2d 234 (Allan v. Allan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Allan v. Allan, 96 N.E.2d 234, 326 Mass. 796 (Mass. 1951).

Pincite

Opinion

Decree affirmed. The husband appealed from a decree dismissing his libel [797]*797for a divorce charging the wife with desertion. We need not recite the reported evidence. The decision rested to a large extent upon the credibility of witnesses. We cannot say that the judge was plainly wrong. The record discloses no error of law or fact. Goren v. Goren, 310 Mass. 284. Levanosky v. Levanosky, 311 Mass. 638, 639.

J. J. McGovern, (M. F. McDuffee with him,) for the libellant. No argument nor brief for the libellee.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Decree affirmed. The husband appealed from a decree dismissing his libel [797]*797for a divorce charging the wife with desertion. We need not recite the reported evidence. The decision rested to a large extent upon the credibility of witnesses. We cannot say that the judge was plainly wrong. The record discloses no error of law or fact. Goren v. Goren, 310 Mass. 284. Levanosky v. Levanosky, 311 Mass. 638, 639.

J. J. McGovern, (M. F. McDuffee with him,) for the libellant. No argument nor brief for the libellee.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

96 N.E.2d 234, 326 Mass. 796, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/allan-v-allan-mass-1951.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack