Allan v. Allan

96 N.E.2d 234, 326 Mass. 796
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court·Decided January 2, 1951·Published

Opinion

Decree affirmed. The husband appealed from a decree dismissing his libel [797]*797for a divorce charging the wife with desertion. We need not recite the reported evidence. The decision rested to a large extent upon the credibility of witnesses. We cannot say that the judge was plainly wrong. The record discloses no error of law or fact. Goren v. Goren, 310 Mass. 284. Levanosky v. Levanosky, 311 Mass. 638, 639.

J. J. McGovern, (M. F. McDuffee with him,) for the libellant. No argument nor brief for the libellee.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Allan v. Allan, 96 N.E.2d 234, 326 Mass. 796 (Mass. 1951).

96 N.E.2d 234 (Allan v. Allan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Goren v. Goren
37 N.E.2d 987 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1941)
Levanosky v. Levanosky
42 N.E.2d 561 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1942)