Allan v. Allan
96 N.E.2d 234, 326 Mass. 796
Opinion
Decree affirmed. The husband appealed from a decree dismissing his libel [797]*797for a divorce charging the wife with desertion. We need not recite the reported evidence. The decision rested to a large extent upon the credibility of witnesses. We cannot say that the judge was plainly wrong. The record discloses no error of law or fact. Goren v. Goren, 310 Mass. 284. Levanosky v. Levanosky, 311 Mass. 638, 639.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Allan v. Allan, 96 N.E.2d 234, 326 Mass. 796 (Mass. 1951).
96 N.E.2d 234 (Allan v. Allan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Goren v. Goren
37 N.E.2d 987 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1941)
Levanosky v. Levanosky
42 N.E.2d 561 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1942)