Allan Ross v. United States

289 F.3d 677
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
DecidedApril 19, 2002
Docket01-12338
StatusPublished

This text of 289 F.3d 677 (Allan Ross v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Allan Ross v. United States, 289 F.3d 677 (11th Cir. 2002).

Opinion

[PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FILED FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT U.S. COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ------------------------------------------- MAY 21, 2002 No. 01-12338 THOMAS K. KAHN CLERK --------------------------------------------

D. C. Docket No. 97-00008 CV-1-MMP

ALLAN ROSS,

Petitioner-Appellant,

versus

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Respondent-Appellee.

---------------------------------------------------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Florida ---------------------------------------------------------------- (May 21, 2002)

Before EDMONDSON, HILL and LAY*, Circuit Judges.

____________________

C Honorable Donald P. Lay, U.S. Circuit Judge for the Eighth Circuit, sitting by designation. BY THE COURT:

We sua sponte amend our opinion issued on 19 April 2002 and published at ___

F.3d ___ by striking the fourth sentence in the eighth paragraph of the opinion and

substituting the following sentence:

Post-Richardson, if jurors cannot agree on what specific offenses make up the continuing series, the jury may not convict the accused of the CCE offense.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
289 F.3d 677, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/allan-ross-v-united-states-ca11-2002.