Allan Robert G. v. Frank Bisignano

D. Nevada

Allan Robert G. v. Frank Bisignano

DecidedJanuary 8, 2026

Docket2:22-cv-00300

StatusUnknown

This text of Allan Robert G. v. Frank Bisignano (Allan Robert G. v. Frank Bisignano) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. Nevada primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Allan Robert G. v. Frank Bisignano, (D. Nev. 2026).

Pincite

Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 7 8] Allan Robert G., Case No. 2:22-cv-00300-NJK. 9 Plaintiff(s), ORDER 10], v. [Docket Nos. 24, 27] 11] Frank Bisignano, 12 Defendant(s). 13 Pending before the Court is Plaintiff’s counsel’s motion for attorneys’ fees of $12,000 14] pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 406(b). Docket No. 24. The Commissioner filed a response taking no position on the reasonableness of the fee request. Docket No. 35. Plaintiffs counsel filed a reply. 16] Docket No. 26. Also pending before the Court is Plaintiff's counsel’s amendment to the fee 17] request, indicating in two sentences that counsel amends the fee motion to $11,524 and waives 18] application of Culbertson v. Berryhill, 139 S. Ct. 517, 519 (2019). Docket No. 27.' Meaningful 19} elaboration is not provided. The Court declines to piece together the fee request that is intended 20] at this juncture, so both motions for fees (Docket Nos. 24, 27) are DENIED without prejudice. 21} Any renewed motion for fees must be filed by January 22, 2026. 22 IT IS SO ORDERED 23 Dated: January 8, 2026

Nancy J. Koppe \. 25 United States. Judge 26 27), ————— ' Although captioned as an “amendment,” this latter filing was docketed by counsel as 28] another motion. See Docket No. 27.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 7 8] Allan Robert G., Case No. 2:22-cv-00300-NJK. 9 Plaintiff(s), ORDER 10], v. [Docket Nos. 24, 27] 11] Frank Bisignano, 12 Defendant(s). 13 Pending before the Court is Plaintiff’s counsel’s motion for attorneys’ fees of $12,000 14] pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 406(b). Docket No. 24. The Commissioner filed a response taking no position on the reasonableness of the fee request. Docket No. 35. Plaintiffs counsel filed a reply. 16] Docket No. 26. Also pending before the Court is Plaintiff's counsel’s amendment to the fee 17] request, indicating in two sentences that counsel amends the fee motion to $11,524 and waives 18] application of Culbertson v. Berryhill, 139 S. Ct. 517, 519 (2019). Docket No. 27.' Meaningful 19} elaboration is not provided. The Court declines to piece together the fee request that is intended 20] at this juncture, so both motions for fees (Docket Nos. 24, 27) are DENIED without prejudice. 21} Any renewed motion for fees must be filed by January 22, 2026. 22 IT IS SO ORDERED 23 Dated: January 8, 2026

Nancy J. Koppe \. 25 United States. Judge 26 27), ————— ' Although captioned as an “amendment,” this latter filing was docketed by counsel as 28] another motion. See Docket No. 27.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Allan Robert G. v. Frank Bisignano, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/allan-robert-g-v-frank-bisignano-nvd-2026.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack