Allan Robert G. v. Frank Bisignano

District Court, D. Nevada·Decided January 8, 2026·No. 2:22-cv-00300·Unknown

Opinion

1 2 3 4 7 8] Allan Robert G., Case No. 2:22-cv-00300-NJK. 9 Plaintiff(s), ORDER 10], v. [Docket Nos. 24, 27] 11] Frank Bisignano, 12 Defendant(s). 13 Pending before the Court is Plaintiff’s counsel’s motion for attorneys’ fees of $12,000 14] pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 406(b). Docket No. 24. The Commissioner filed a response taking no position on the reasonableness of the fee request. Docket No. 35. Plaintiffs counsel filed a reply. 16] Docket No. 26. Also pending before the Court is Plaintiff's counsel’s amendment to the fee 17] request, indicating in two sentences that counsel amends the fee motion to $11,524 and waives 18] application of Culbertson v. Berryhill, 139 S. Ct. 517, 519 (2019). Docket No. 27.' Meaningful 19} elaboration is not provided. The Court declines to piece together the fee request that is intended 20] at this juncture, so both motions for fees (Docket Nos. 24, 27) are DENIED without prejudice. 21} Any renewed motion for fees must be filed by January 22, 2026. 23 Dated: January 8, 2026

Nancy J. Koppe \. 25 United States. Judge 26 27), ————— ' Although captioned as an “amendment,” this latter filing was docketed by counsel as 28] another motion. See Docket No. 27.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Allan Robert G. v. Frank Bisignano, (D. Nev. 2026).

Allan Robert G. v. Frank Bisignano (Allan Robert G. v. Frank Bisignano) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Culbertson v. Berryhill
586 U.S. 53 (Supreme Court, 2019)