Allan Jacob and Sandra Jacob v. Yisrael Taussig, Malka Singer Taussig, et al.
This text of Allan Jacob and Sandra Jacob v. Yisrael Taussig, Malka Singer Taussig, et al. (Allan Jacob and Sandra Jacob v. Yisrael Taussig, Malka Singer Taussig, et al.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, M.D. Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION
ALLAN JACOB and SANDRA JACOB,
Plaintiffs,
v. Case No. 8:25-cv-1118-KKM-AAS
YISRAEL TAUSSIG, MALKA SINGER TAUSSIG, et al.,
Defendants.
ORDER The United States Magistrate Judge recommends granting in part and denying in part Allan Jacob and Sandra Jacob’s motion for default judgment against Yisrael Taussig, Malka Singer Taussig, Ruchama Taussig, ARLG, LLC, Herman & Sons LLC (H&S), Herman Taussig, and Aaron Taussig. (Docs. 34, 39). The deadline to object to the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation has passed without any party lodging an objection. Considering the record, I adopt the Report and Recommendation. After conducting a review of the findings and recommendations, a district judge may accept, reject, or modify a magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). If a party files a timely and specific objection to a finding of fact by a magistrate judge, the district court must conduct a de novo review with respect to that factual issue. Stokes v. Singletary, 952 F.2d 1567, 1576 (11th Cir. 1992). The district court reviews
legal conclusions de novo, even in the absence of an objection. See Cooper- Houston v. S. Ry. Co., 37 F.3d 603, 604 (11th Cir. 1994); Ashworth v. Glades Cnty. Bd. of Cnty. Comm’rs, 379 F. Supp. 3d 1244, 1246 (M.D. Fla. 2019). In the absence of any objection and after reviewing the factual
allegations and legal conclusions, I adopt the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation. Accordingly, it is ORDERED: 1. The Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (Doc. 39) is
ADOPTED and made a part of this Order for all purposes. 2. Plaintiffs’ Motion for Default Judgment (Doc. 34) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. 3. The Clerk is directed to ENTER JUDGMENT as follows:
a. In favor of Allan Jacob and Sandra Jacob and against Malka Singer Taussig on Count I of the Complaint. The transfer of property located at 16446 Little Garden Drive, Wimauma, FL 33598, from 46 Little Garden LLC to ARLG is void.
b. In favor of Allan Jacob and Sandra Jacob and against Malka Singer Taussig on Count II of the Complaint. The transfer of property located at 16313 Little Garden Drive, Wimauma, FL 33598, from 13 Little Garden, LLC to H&S is void.
c. In favor of Allan Jacob and Sandra Jacob and against ARLG
on Count III of the Complaint, and against Ruchama Taussig on Count IV of the Complaint. The transfer of property located at 16446 Little Garden Drive, Wimauma, FL 33598, from ARLG to H&S is void. d. In favor of Allan Jacob and Sandra Jacob and against Yisrael Taussig, Malka Singer Taussig, Ruchama Taussig, ARLG, H&S, Herman Taussig, and Aaron Taussig on Count VI of the Complaint, with respect to property located at 16446 Little Garden and 163813 Little Garden, on which Allan Jacob and Sandra Jacob have the right to level execution. 4. Count V of the Complaint is DISMISSED. 5. The Clerk is directed to CLOSE this case and TERMINATE any pending motions or deadlines. ORDERED in Tampa, Florida, on December 22, 2025.
Aamlall ,
United States District Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Allan Jacob and Sandra Jacob v. Yisrael Taussig, Malka Singer Taussig, et al., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/allan-jacob-and-sandra-jacob-v-yisrael-taussig-malka-singer-taussig-et-flmd-2025.