Allan Falk v. Attorney Grievance Commission

Michigan Supreme Court

Allan Falk v. Attorney Grievance Commission

DecidedApril 28, 2015

Docket149308

StatusPublished

This text of Allan Falk v. Attorney Grievance Commission (Allan Falk v. Attorney Grievance Commission) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Allan Falk v. Attorney Grievance Commission, (Mich. 2015).

Pincite

Opinion

Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

April 28, 2015 Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman Mary Beth Kelly 149308(14) Brian K. Zahra Bridget M. McCormack David F. Viviano ALLAN FALK, Richard H. Bernstein, Plaintiff, Justices

v SC: 149308 AGC: 0064-13 0323-13 ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION, Defendant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the motion for review of taxation of costs is GRANTED in part, pursuant to MCL 600.2445(2), MCR 7.219, and MCR 7.318. In light of the unusual circumstances of this case, in which the Court directed the Attorney Grievance Commission to follow the procedures set forth in MCR 9.131, we conclude that the plaintiff improved his position by filing the motion to amend the complaint for superintending control. The Clerk is thus directed to issue a letter taxing costs of $37.50 in favor of the plaintiff, which is one-half of the motion filing fee.

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. April 28, 2015 d0420 Clerk

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

April 28, 2015 Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman Mary Beth Kelly 149308(14) Brian K. Zahra Bridget M. McCormack David F. Viviano ALLAN FALK, Richard H. Bernstein, Plaintiff, Justices

v SC: 149308 AGC: 0064-13 0323-13 ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION, Defendant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the motion for review of taxation of costs is GRANTED in part, pursuant to MCL 600.2445(2), MCR 7.219, and MCR 7.318. In light of the unusual circumstances of this case, in which the Court directed the Attorney Grievance Commission to follow the procedures set forth in MCR 9.131, we conclude that the plaintiff improved his position by filing the motion to amend the complaint for superintending control. The Clerk is thus directed to issue a letter taxing costs of $37.50 in favor of the plaintiff, which is one-half of the motion filing fee.

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. April 28, 2015 d0420 Clerk

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Allan Falk v. Attorney Grievance Commission, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/allan-falk-v-attorney-grievance-commission-mich-2015.