Allan Falk v. Attorney Grievance Commission

CourtMichigan Supreme Court
DecidedJune 17, 2014
Docket149308
StatusPublished

This text of Allan Falk v. Attorney Grievance Commission (Allan Falk v. Attorney Grievance Commission) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Allan Falk v. Attorney Grievance Commission, (Mich. 2014).

Opinion

Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

June 17, 2014 Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh Stephen J. Markman 149308(3) Mary Beth Kelly Brian K. Zahra Bridget M. McCormack David F. Viviano, Justices ALLAN FALK, Plaintiff,

v SC: 149308

ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION, Defendant. _____________________________________/

On order of the Chief Justice, the Grievance Administrator’s motion to extend the time to file a response to the complaint for superintending control is GRANTED. The response will be accepted as timely filed if filed on or before June 24, 2014.

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. June 17, 2014 Clerk

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Allan Falk v. Attorney Grievance Commission, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/allan-falk-v-attorney-grievance-commission-mich-2014.