Allah v. Scholnick

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Allah v. Scholnick

257 A.D.2d 573, 682 N.Y.S.2d 892, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 130

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 11, 1999

StatusPublished

This text of 257 A.D.2d 573 (Allah v. Scholnick) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Allah v. Scholnick, 257 A.D.2d 573, 682 N.Y.S.2d 892, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 130 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

—Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 in the nature of mandamus, inter alia, to compel the respondent Justice of the Supreme Court to direct the petitioner’s trial counsel to release his files, and application for poor person relief.

Upon the petition and papers filed in support of the proceeding, and upon the papers filed in opposition thereto, it is,

Ordered that the application for poor person relief is granted; and it is further,

Adjudged that the petition is denied and the proceeding is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

The extraordinary remedy of mandamus will lie only to compel the performance of a ministerial act and only when there exists a clear legal right to the relief sought (see, Matter of Legal Aid Socy. v Scheinman, 53 NY2d 12, 16). The petitioner has failed to demonstrate a clear legal right to the relief sought. Mangano, P. J., Miller, Thompson and Luciano, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI