ALL INSURANCE RESTORATION SERVICES, INC. v. CITIZENS PROPERTY INSURANCE CORPORATION

District Court of Appeal of Florida

ALL INSURANCE RESTORATION SERVICES, INC. v. CITIZENS PROPERTY INSURANCE CORPORATION

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedNovember 24, 2021

Docket21-0077

StatusPublished

This text of ALL INSURANCE RESTORATION SERVICES, INC. v. CITIZENS PROPERTY INSURANCE CORPORATION (ALL INSURANCE RESTORATION SERVICES, INC. v. CITIZENS PROPERTY INSURANCE CORPORATION) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

ALL INSURANCE RESTORATION SERVICES, INC. v. CITIZENS PROPERTY INSURANCE CORPORATION, (Fla. Ct. App. 2021).

Pincite

Opinion

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT

ALL INSURANCE RESTORATION SERVICES, INC., a/a/o MELISSA MALCOLM, Appellant,

v.

CITIZENS PROPERTY INSURANCE CORPORATION, Appellee.

No. 4D21-77

[November 24, 2021]

Appeal from the County Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Nina W. Di Pietro, Judge; L.T. Case Nos. CACE 20-18406 and COCE 18-26367.

Erin M. Berger and Melissa A. Giasi of Giasi Law, P.A., Tampa, for appellant.

Kimberly J. Fernandes of Kelley Kronenberg, P.A., Tallahassee, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Damages Servs., Inc. v. Citizens Prop. Ins. Corp., 46 Fla. L. Weekly D2245, D2246 (Fla. 4th DCA Oct. 13, 2021) (insurer entitled to summary judgment on the issue of reasonable emergency measures expenses “[b]ecause [the restoration company] did not make a request to exceed the policy limit prior to exceeding the limit for the work performed” (emphasis added)); Certified Priority Restoration v. Universal Ins. Co. of N. Am., No. 4D21-374, 2021 WL 3641850, at *3 (Fla. 4th DCA Aug. 18, 2021) (insurer entitled to summary judgment where restoration company “failed to request the insurer allow it to exceed the $3,000 limit before submitting the invoice for the completed work” (emphasis added)).

CONNER, C.J., MAY and DAMOORGIAN, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT

ALL INSURANCE RESTORATION SERVICES, INC., a/a/o MELISSA MALCOLM, Appellant,

v.

CITIZENS PROPERTY INSURANCE CORPORATION, Appellee.

No. 4D21-77

[November 24, 2021]

Appeal from the County Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Nina W. Di Pietro, Judge; L.T. Case Nos. CACE 20-18406 and COCE 18-26367.

Erin M. Berger and Melissa A. Giasi of Giasi Law, P.A., Tampa, for appellant.

Kimberly J. Fernandes of Kelley Kronenberg, P.A., Tallahassee, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Damages Servs., Inc. v. Citizens Prop. Ins. Corp., 46 Fla. L. Weekly D2245, D2246 (Fla. 4th DCA Oct. 13, 2021) (insurer entitled to summary judgment on the issue of reasonable emergency measures expenses “[b]ecause [the restoration company] did not make a request to exceed the policy limit prior to exceeding the limit for the work performed” (emphasis added)); Certified Priority Restoration v. Universal Ins. Co. of N. Am., No. 4D21-374, 2021 WL 3641850, at *3 (Fla. 4th DCA Aug. 18, 2021) (insurer entitled to summary judgment where restoration company “failed to request the insurer allow it to exceed the $3,000 limit before submitting the invoice for the completed work” (emphasis added)).

CONNER, C.J., MAY and DAMOORGIAN, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

ALL INSURANCE RESTORATION SERVICES, INC. v. CITIZENS PROPERTY INSURANCE CORPORATION, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/all-insurance-restoration-services-inc-v-citizens-property-insurance-fladistctapp-2021.