Alkire-Clemen v. Castle Medical Center

Hawaii Supreme Court·Decided August 26, 2013·No. SCWC-12-0000095·Published

Opinion

Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-12-0000095 26-AUG-2013 02:35 PM

SCWC-12-0000095

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I

VIHN ALKIRE-CLEMEN,

Petitioner/Claimant-Appellant, vs.

CASTLE MEDICAL CENTER,

Respondent/Employer-Appellee, Self-insured, and

CRAWFORD AND COMPANY,

Respondent/Insurance Adjuster-Appellee.

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (CAAP-12-0000095; CASE NO. AB 2003-121(S) (2-02-09980))

ORDER DISMISSING MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, Acoba, McKenna, and Pollack, JJ.)

On August 20, 2013, Petitioner/Claimant-Appellant Vihn

Alkire-Clemen (Petitioner) filed a document entitled “Motion for

New Trial or Amendment of Judgment Rule 59(a) and Rule 59(e)

Federal Rules of Civil Procedure” (Motion), which we review as a

motion for reconsideration of the August 19, 2013 Order Rejecting

Application for Writ of Certiorari. Our rules do not allow for

reconsideration of the acceptance or rejection of an application

for a writ of certiorari. See Hawai#i Rules of Appellate

Procedure Rule 40.1(h). Therefore,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Petitioner’s Motion is

dismissed.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, August 26, 2013.

Vihn Alkire-Clemen /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald petitioner pro se /s/ Paula A. Nakayama

/s/ Simeon R. Acoba, Jr.

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna

/s/ Richard W. Pollack

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Alkire-Clemen v. Castle Medical Center, (haw 2013).

Alkire-Clemen v. Castle Medical Center (Alkire-Clemen v. Castle Medical Center) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.