Alkhafaji v. Tiaa-Cref

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Alkhafaji v. Tiaa-Cref

30 A.3d 1100

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedOctober 13, 2011

Docket135 WAL 2011

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 30 A.3d 1100 (Alkhafaji v. Tiaa-Cref) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Alkhafaji v. Tiaa-Cref, 30 A.3d 1100 (Pa. 2011).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 13th day of October, 2011, the Petition for Alowance of Appeal is GRANTED, LIMITED TO the issue set forth below. The Petition is DENIED as to all remaining issues. The issue, as stated by Petitioner, is:

Did the Superior Court err when it reversed the decision of the lower court and held that a change of beneficiary by will was not, as a matter of law, permitted when the notice provision of TIAA-CREF annuity contracts did not clearly and unambiguously preclude a beneficiary designation by will?

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 13th day of October, 2011, the Petition for Alowance of Appeal is GRANTED, LIMITED TO the issue set forth below. The Petition is DENIED as to all remaining issues. The issue, as stated by Petitioner, is:

Did the Superior Court err when it reversed the decision of the lower court and held that a change of beneficiary by will was not, as a matter of law, permitted when the notice provision of TIAA-CREF annuity contracts did not clearly and unambiguously preclude a beneficiary designation by will?

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

30 A.3d 1100, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/alkhafaji-v-tiaa-cref-pa-2011.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack