Alkebulanyahh v. Nettles

454 F. App'x 231
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedNovember 18, 2011
DocketNo. 11-6987
StatusPublished

This text of 454 F. App'x 231 (Alkebulanyahh v. Nettles) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Alkebulanyahh v. Nettles, 454 F. App'x 231 (4th Cir. 2011).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Abdiyyah ben Alkebulanyahh appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief without prejudice on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Alkebulanyahh v. Nettles, No. 6:10-cv-02976-MBS, 2011 WL 2728453 (D.S.C. July 13, 2011). We deny Alkebulanyahh’s motions for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
454 F. App'x 231, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/alkebulanyahh-v-nettles-ca4-2011.