Alkam Home Fashion, Inc. v. Legacy Decor

CourtDistrict Court, C.D. California
DecidedNovember 22, 2023
Docket8:23-cv-01177
StatusUnknown

This text of Alkam Home Fashion, Inc. v. Legacy Decor (Alkam Home Fashion, Inc. v. Legacy Decor) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, C.D. California primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Alkam Home Fashion, Inc. v. Legacy Decor, (C.D. Cal. 2023).

Opinion

2 3

4 5

8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 10 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

11 ) 12 Alkam Home Fashion, Inc., a ) Civil Case No. 8:23-cv-01177-DOC-AJR California corporation, ) 13 ) [PROPOSED] STIPULATED 14 Plaintiff, ) PROTECTIVE ORDER ) 15 v. ) 16 ) 17 Legacy Decor, a California ) corporation, ) 18 ) 19 Defendant. ) ) 20 ) 21 ) ) 22

23 24 1. GENERAL 25 1.1 Purposes and Limitations. Discovery in this action is likely to involve 26 production of confidential, proprietary, or private information for which special 27 protection from public disclosure and from use for any purpose other than 28 prosecuting this litigation may be warranted. Accordingly, the parties hereby 1 stipulate to and petition the Court to enter the following Stipulated Protective 2 Order. The parties acknowledge that this Order does not confer blanket protections 3 on all disclosures or responses to discovery and that the protection it affords from 4 public disclosure and use extends only to the limited information or items that are 5 entitled to confidential treatment under the applicable legal principles. The parties 6 further acknowledge, as set forth in Section 12.3, below, that this Stipulated 7 Protective Order does not entitle them to file confidential information under seal; 8 Civil Local Rule 79-5 sets forth the procedures that must be followed and the 9 standards that will be applied when a party seeks permission from the court to file 10 material under seal. 11 1.2 Good Cause Statement. 12 This action is likely to involve trade secrets, customer and pricing lists and 13 other valuable research, development, commercial, financial, technical and/or 14 proprietary information for which special protection from public disclosure and 15 from use for any purpose other than prosecution of this action is warranted. Such 16 confidential and proprietary materials and information consist of, among other 17 things, confidential business or financial information, information regarding 18 confidential business practices, or other confidential research, development, or 19 commercial information (including information implicating privacy rights of third 20 parties), information otherwise generally unavailable to the public, or which may 21 be privileged or otherwise protected from disclosure under state or federal statutes, 22 court rules, case decisions, or common law. Accordingly, to expedite the flow of 23 information, to facilitate the prompt resolution of disputes over confidentiality of 24 discovery materials, to adequately protect information the parties are entitled to 25 keep confidential, to ensure that the parties are permitted reasonable necessary uses 26 of such material in preparation for and in the conduct of trial, to address their 27 handling at the end of the litigation, and serve the ends of justice, a protective order 28 for such information is justified in this matter. It is the intent of the parties that 1 information will not be designated as confidential for tactical reasons and that 2 nothing be so designated without a good faith belief that it has been maintained in 3 a confidential, non-public manner, and there is good cause why it should not be 4 part of the public record of this case. 5 2. DEFINITIONS 6 2.1 Action: This pending federal lawsuit. 7 2.2 Challenging Party: a Party or Non-Party that challenges the 8 designation of information or items under this Order. 9 2.3a “CONFIDENTIAL” Information or Items: information (regardless of 10 how it is generated, stored or maintained) or tangible things that qualify for 11 protection under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(c), and as specified above in 12 the Good Cause Statement. 13 2.3b “CONFIDENTIAL – FOR COUNSEL ONLY” Information or Items: 14 information (regardless of how it is generated, stored or maintained) or tangible 15 things that qualify for protection under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(c), and 16 as specified above in the Good Cause Statement. Furthermore, such information 17 and items shall be designated “CONFIDENTIAL – FOR COUNSEL ONLY,” only 18 if, in the good faith belief of such party and its counsel, the information is among 19 that considered to be most sensitive by the party including, but not limited to, trade 20 secret or other confidential research, development, financial or other commercial 21 information. 22 2.4 Counsel: Outside Counsel of Record and House Counsel (as well as 23 their support staff). 24 2.5 Designating Party: a Party or Non-Party that designates information 25 or items that it produces in disclosures or in responses to discovery as 26 “CONFIDENTIAL.” 27 2.6 Disclosure or Discovery Material: all items or information, regardless 28 of the medium or manner in which it is generated, stored, or maintained (including, 1 among other things, testimony, transcripts, and tangible things), that are produced 2 or generated in disclosures or responses to discovery in this matter. 3 2.7 Expert: a person with specialized knowledge or experience in a 4 matter pertinent to the litigation who has been retained by a Party or its counsel to 5 serve as an expert witness or as a consultant in this Action. 6 2.8 House Counsel: attorneys who are employees of a party to this 7 Action. House Counsel does not include Outside Counsel of Record or any other 8 outside counsel. 9 2.9 Non-Party: any natural person, partnership, corporation, association, 10 or other legal entity not named as a Party to this action. 11 2.10 Outside Counsel of Record: attorneys who are not employees of a 12 party to this Action but are retained to represent or advise a party to this Action 13 and have appeared in this Action on behalf of that party or are affiliated with a law 14 firm that has appeared on behalf of that party, including support staff. 15 2.11 Party: any party to this Action, including all of its officers, directors, 16 employees, consultants, retained experts, and Outside Counsel of Record (and their 17 support staffs). 18 2.12 Producing Party: a Party or Non-Party that produces Disclosure or 19 Discovery Material in this Action. 20 2.13 Professional Vendors: persons or entities that provide litigation 21 support services (e.g., photocopying, videotaping, translating, preparing exhibits 22 or demonstrations, and organizing, storing, or retrieving data in any form or 23 medium) and their employees and subcontractors. 24 2.14 Protected Material: any Disclosure or Discovery Material that is 25 designated as “CONFIDENTIAL” or “CONFIDENTIAL – FOR COUNSEL 26 ONLY.” 27 2.15 Receiving Party: a Party that receives Disclosure or Discovery 28 Material from a Producing Party. 1 3. SCOPE 2 The protections conferred by this Stipulation and Order cover not only 3 Protected Material (as defined above), but also (1) any information copied or 4 extracted from Protected Material; (2) all copies, excerpts, summaries, or 5 compilations of Protected Material; and (3) any testimony, conversations, or 6 presentations by Parties or their Counsel that might reveal Protected Material. 7 Any use of Protected Material at trial shall be governed by the orders of the 8 trial judge. This Order does not govern the use of Protected Material at trial. 9 10 4. DURATION 11 Once a case proceeds to trial, all of the court-filed information to be 12 introduced that was previously designated as confidential or maintained pursuant 13 to this protective order becomes public and will be presumptively available to all 14 members of the public, including the press, unless compelling reasons supported 15 by specific factual findings to proceed otherwise are made to the trial judge in 16 advance of the trial. See Kamakana v. City and Cty. of Honolulu, 447 F.3d 1172, 17 1180-81 (9th Cir.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Rineer v. Collins
27 A. 28 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1893)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Alkam Home Fashion, Inc. v. Legacy Decor, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/alkam-home-fashion-inc-v-legacy-decor-cacd-2023.