Aljahmi v. 1738 Finest Deli Inc.

CourtDistrict Court, S.D. New York
DecidedApril 5, 2023
Docket1:22-cv-04138
StatusUnknown

This text of Aljahmi v. 1738 Finest Deli Inc. (Aljahmi v. 1738 Finest Deli Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Aljahmi v. 1738 Finest Deli Inc., (S.D.N.Y. 2023).

Opinion

ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOC #: FISHER | TH pATEFILED. 4/5/2023 225 Broadway, Suite 1700 New York, New York 10007 Main 212.571.0700 Fax 212.505.2001 www.fishertaubenfeld.com Writer’s direct dial: (212) 384-0258 Writer’s email: michael @fishertaubenfeld.com April 3, 2023 VIA ECF Hon. Analisa Torres United States District Judge Daniel Patrick Moynihan United States Courthouse 500 Pearl Street New York, NY 10007-1312 Re: Aljahmi. v. 1738 Finest Deli Inc et al. Case No.: 22-cv-4138 (AT) Dear Judge Torres: We represent Plaintiff in this matter. We write to request an extension of the deadline to file a default judgment against Corporate Defendant 1738 Finest Deli Inc. until after the claim against the answering defendant, Defendant Aljahmi, is resolved or, if the Court declines to grant this request, until April 18, 2023. We respectfully request that the Court adjourn the deadline to move for a default judgment against the defaulting Defendant in order to avoid the possibility of inconsistent judgments between the defaulting Defendant and Defendant Aljahmi, who is defending himself in this matter. Courts have declined to enter a default judgment against a non-answering defendant when there were answering defendants in the matter because of the risk of inconsistent judgments and waste of judicial resources that would arise from having to determine damages for the same work more than once. Lemache v. Tunnel Taxi Mgmt., LLC, 354 F. Supp. 3d 149, 154 (E.D.N.Y. 2019) (citing cases). Further, the defaulting Defendant owned a deli that is now closed, and prior to discovery it is difficult to know whether it even possesses any assets that warrant the Court and parties’ expenditure of time and resources. We therefore respectfully request that the Court adjourn Plaintiff’s deadline to move for a default judgment until after the claim against Defendant Aljahmi is resolved. In the alternative, if an adjournment until the resolution of the active claim is not possible, we respectfully request an extension of two approximately weeks until April 18, 2023 in order to account for the Passover holiday that I will be observing. Plaintiff shall move for default judgment within fourteen days of a final judgment as to Defendant Aljahr

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lemache v. Tunnel Taxi Mgmt., LLC
354 F. Supp. 3d 149 (E.D. New York, 2019)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Aljahmi v. 1738 Finest Deli Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/aljahmi-v-1738-finest-deli-inc-nysd-2023.